Comments on: Obama v. Fox News http://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/2010/10/obama-v-fox-news/ Informed reflection on the events of the day Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:00:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.23 By: Anonymous http://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/2010/10/obama-v-fox-news/comment-page-1/#comment-17368 Sun, 25 Sep 2011 01:39:00 +0000 http://www.deliberatelyconsidered.com/?p=418#comment-17368 Well, you know I agree that Obama can afford to be more fierce — he can spear the right, when/if he chooses— because Fox will say about him whatever they want to say, for the reasons you mention. They all, more or less, push the agenda of the right. I have only recently started watching Republican news, and I mean that as I wrote it, because I think Obama is pushing his Jobs Act hard and he is doing it relentlessly and with political acumen and charm and I am curious what they say about it, how they say it and if I can observe anything no one else has— to be determined. But back to Fox and what Fox has done (in my opinion) is capture and articulate a certain strain of American populism and it has done so from all angles, from Beck’s “passion” to O’Reilly’ s “hard questions and facts” to every outdated no-neck moronic-ness behind every Philadelphian WASP in the Social Register that is Hannity.

What you quote is very Obama— it is measured and smart. It does not matter what he says or what he does— if he goes on the attack or answers questions with reason (maybe not deserved) and betrays how he really feels and what he sees and knows with his laugh, that you have in quotations— because in watching Obama speak, again trying to see what is interesting, consistent, changing, etc— I have noticed that he speaks truth in a way that is subtle and at the same time that he speaks the truth, he usually laughs— his face lights up but never breaks into real laughter— it is quick and it says it all.

Just go back to the speech he gave at the Dem convention for Kerry— when he talks about a real democracy wherein every vote counts, he qualifies it by saying something like “most of the time” —and one big grin, a little laugh and a knowing look around the room.

The long/short of it is— I hope he keeps going the way he is going because he will gather support if he does and he may get a chance to do a lot more in his second term. I slide him the benefit of the doubt — he used the wrong tactic for nearly a year but, as you noted, that tactic was always in his playbook, or, less cynically, his deeply held belief that we are really purple; we are united. I give him, right now, tremendous credit for learning quickly and going aggressive— a year is nothing, if you think about it, to let go of a long-held conviction.

]]>