A Letter on the Brazilian Protests

People protesting in the streets of Rio de Janeiro. The sign reads "Se a passagem não baixar, o Rio vai parar!", which is translated to "If the ticket (price) doesn't drop, Rio is going to stop!" © Tânia Rêgo | Agência Brasil

Last summer in The New School’s Democracy and Diversity Institute in Wroclaw, Poland, I taught a course on the new “new social movements,” comparing the social movements of 2011-2 with those of 1968 and 1989. The working thesis: “While traditional social movements were primarily about resources and interest, and “the new social movements” of the late 20th century were more centered on questions of identity, as Touraine and Melucci investigated, the social movements of our most recent past and of the present day are primarily about addressing perceived injustices through the constitution of autonomous publics.” This year I am teaching a variation on last year’s theme. Focusing on how the new social movements and the publics they create interact with existing political institutions and parties. “The center of our investigation will be a sociology of publics as they mediate between institutional politics and social movements. We will work on developing a framework for exploring the way movements create new publics, and affect the operations of political parties and the direction of state policy.” Recent events in Brazil, Turkey and Iran (and elsewhere) illuminate the problems I hope we will investigate next month. Today, the first of a series of reports on these developments: a letter to last year’s seminar participants from Fernanda Canofre dos Santos on unfolding protests in Brazil. Coming up a report on Turkey and Iran. -Jeff

It’s been a while and I hope everyone is doing great. Well, I’m back to Brazil, and after everything that is happening here this week (I don’t know if you’ve heard about it, but anyway), I just felt that I had . . .

Read more: A Letter on the Brazilian Protests

Hannah and Me: Introduction

Hannah Arendt (Oct. 14, 1906 - 1975) © Unknown (from G4GTi - Ryohei Noda's/aka G4GTi photostream) | Flickr

To skip this introduction and go directly to today’s In-Depth Analysis, “Hannah and Me: Understanding Politics in Dark Times,” click here.

A few years ago, I was invited to take part in a conference on Hannah Arendt in Brasilia. It was a gathering of political theorists and philosophers for the most part. I knew that the papers presented to the conference would offer a variety of close readings of Arendt challenging thought, considering the significance of her work as it fit in with or challenged other philosophies and political theories. I didn’t feel that I had much to offer in this register, so I decided to do something a bit different.

Since Arendt has been a guide for me for understanding remarkable political events, first and foremost the challenge to and the resulting downfall of previously existing socialism in East and Central Europe, which I witnessed from the early 1970s, I decided to explain how I came to lean on her thought in my attempt to understand the significance of events that others were overlooking. I explained how I first underestimated Arendt, how a student forced me to pay attention and how she helped me address unique developments of our time with a critical perspective beyond the clichés of partisan thought: conservative and liberal, left and right, communist and anti-communist, terrorist, anti-terrorist and anti- anti -terrorist.

I have decided to post my talk here, which was published in Portuguese, as an extension of my review of Hannah Arendt, the movie, a film I appreciated but felt was a bit too one sided and overlooked the richness of Arendt’s thought (given the limits of film, quite understandable). Though I never met her, Arendt has been speaking to me for the last thirty plus years as I have been trying to make sense of a perplexing political world. Here you can . . .

Read more: Hannah and Me: Introduction